Recently in U.S. Legislature Category

To start off I need to say that I am writing this letter as a resident of Laconia, NH in the 1st Congressional District and not in my positions of City Councilor and Laconia Republican Committee Chairman.

I sure hope the new Obamacare health plan covers hearing aids because it appears that our ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE needs some. How does Carol Shea-Porter not hear what we, her constituents, are saying? Let us review her record this session.

During the August congressional recess the healthcare debate was going strong (one sided of course) and the elected representatives left Washington to hear from their constituents back home. That is the representatives of the other 49 states had meetings. Since OUR representatives in New Hampshire refused to meet with us until the media pressure became so great that they conceded. Carol Shea-Porter only held 2 meetings at Federal Buildings in Manchester and Portsmouth where she felt safe. These meetings were not publicized; were filled with people from Massachusetts (not her district or state); and the questions asked were, for the most part, limited to her supporters only. How can you determine what your employers (the people in your district) expect from you if only one side is presented? Was it too scary to actually hear from the people that she represents?

She voted for the original House Bill that included bribes to legislators. She apparently has no problem paying OUR tax dollars as favors to other states. I am trying to remember who she represents, since I thought it was NEW HAMPSHIRE.


The following is the Press Release from Frank Guinta on the Laconia Town Hall meeting that Carol Shea-Porter is having on Thursday, April 1st (April Fool’s Day)

At least she seems to have picked the right day…..

Carol Shea-Porter’s Town Hall Strategy: Small Venues, Limited Access and Few Questions

MANCHESTER, NH – Tomorrow Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter comes home to explain her vote for a government takeover of healthcare. Shea-Porter has announced eight evening forums in Bedford and Merrimack tomorrow with additional stops in Alton, Laconia on Thursday, with the rest coming next week. These town halls have a goal of creating an illusion of being open. When in reality it appears that Shea-Porter is using small venues to limit participation and only allowing questions from those with tickets. When a City Councilor in Laconia asked the City to offer Shea-Porter a much larger venue at the local high school, or even the library (within eyeshot of City Hall), her office declined the offer, saying they prefer the smaller venue at city hall.

 “Our city of 17,000 has multiple venues that could accommodate what’s expected to be a much larger crowd and really allow the citizens of this community to be heard; no matter how they feel on health care reform. It is my view this city is being used as a prop as the Congresswoman does her victory lap around the district,” said Greg Knytych, City Councilor Ward One.  He continues “Bad enough she is holding it in a small limited space, but refusing to hold it in a venue that will allow access to no more than simply 0.0035% of Laconia’s population is outrageous.”

“On the heels of passage of this partisan healthcare reform bill, fraught with sweetheart backroom deals like the, “Louisiana Purchase” and “Gatorade” Carol Shea-Porter owes it to the citizens of her district to hold open and honest town halls not just create the illusion of doing so,” said Congressional Candidate Frank Guinta. “Like so many New Hampshire voters, I oppose this bill because it hurts our local businesses and cuts Medicare.  We deserve an real New Hampshire town hall to hear from our elected official who supported such a disastrous plan.”

Mayor Guinta has held eight open town halls since August. His original challenge and the scheduling of his Exeter Town Hall is what finally caused Congressman Shea-Porter to meet with her constituents at all. Following the only town hall held on the issue of healthcare reform by Mayor Frank Guinta, candidate for Congress.  As part of his listening tour, candidate Frank Guinta launched an online listening post, with the publishing of voter’s comments that have yet to be heard.  This listening post was a “petition drive” and promoted by the campaign sub-website: www.honesthealthcarereform.com

The highly partisan charged atmosphere has left most in the dark, including the national press which will be banned from attending any of the currently scheduled town halls.

It's time to get involved...

| | Comments (0)

The following is the letter I have submitted to the Laconia Daily Sun and the Citizen of Laconia.

To the Editor:

I read the article (Laconia Daily Sun, Tuesday, February 16th) about the local impact of the budget cuts being pursued by the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) with quite some interest and feel compelled to share my thoughts of this story. 

I agree with Senator Sgambati calling these reductions in payments to health care providers as “unacceptable”. I don’t know why DHHS is always looked at to compensate the lion’s share of expenditure cuts for the ridiculous spending our state legislators put into the state budget. This policy only shifts costs from the state to private institutions, which then have to pass that loss onto higher costs for services which we all pay through higher health insurance premiums. This helps to create the call for completely changing our health care system into what will ultimately be a single payer system. I have a feeling that this cost shift is what we are to expect with the current federal plan being negotiated behind closed doors in Washington, until there comes a point when no private health care provider or insurance company exists to pass the costs onto. Then the rationing will start.


What is the Energy Bill???

| | Comments (0)

More Importantly What has happened to the Energy Bill???

Congress has decided to suspend debate on the Energy Bill for unknown reasons. The Senate and House of Representatives each passed differing versions of the Energy Bill and they are supposed to be in conference compromising the two versions. This hasn’t happened, and that may be a good thing.

You may now be wondering what is in this Energy Bill.

Some of the items included in the bill are:

1        CAFE standards, which reduces the size of cars in order to get better fuel efficiency.

2        Mandates Increased Ethanol production.

3        Increased tax subsidies for Ethanol production.

The video below is Ben Lieberman discussing the associate costs and consequences for passing an energy bill that goes in this direction.

That isn’t the whole of it. There are some major issues and concerns with the ethanol mandates in general. Here are some more facts to ponder:

1.      America’s energy policy has been on an ethanol binge for a while now.

a.       The 2005 energy bill contained the first-ever requirement that these fuels be mixed into the nation’s gasoline supply.

b.      Beginning in 2006 the mandates came on top of massive subsidies and tax breaks already enjoyed by domestic ethanol producers.

c.       The mandate quickly proved to be a mistake – raising rather than lowering fuel costs and sparking food price inflation. These mandates have invoked environmental opposition.

d.      America is now committed to 9 billion gallons of renewable fuels in 2008 and 36 billion gallons by 2022.

e.       For the next few years almost all of this mandate will be met by corn ethanol.

2.      The anger over the high cost of gasoline was the main impetus behind the 2005 and 2007 energy bills, and their successively higher ethanol mandates.

a.       Congress and the public have mistakenly assumed that ethanol is cheaper but the reality is beginning to hit home.

b.      When everything is taken into account (lower fuel economy; increased food prices; and increased tax subsidies) people wonder why ethanol had to be mandated in the first place.

c.       The charts below show an AAA calculation of the national average for the different types of fuel used by automobiles on the highways.

National Unleaded Average

 

Regular

Mid

Premium

Diesel

E85

**E85 MPG/BTU adjusted price

 

Current Avg.

$3.599

$3.822

$3.959

$4.243

$3.034

$3.992

Yesterday Avg.

$3.591

$3.813

$3.950

$4.238

$3.022

$3.977

Month Ago Avg.

$3.275

$3.477

$3.603

$4.018

$2.681

$3.529

Year Ago Avg.

$2.924

$3.104

$3.216

$2.921

NA

NA

 

*Prices are in US dollars per gallon

**The BTU-adjusted price of E-85 is the nationwide average price of E-85 adjusted to reflect the lower energy content as expressed in British Thermal Units - and hence miles per gallon - available in a gallon of E-85 as compared to the same volume of conventional gasoline. The BTU-adjusted price calculated by OPIS and AAA is not an actual retail average price paid by consumers. It is calculated and displayed as part of AAA's Fuel Gauge Report because according to the Energy Information Administration E-85 delivers approximately 25 percent fewer BTUs by volume than conventional gasoline. Because "flexible fuel" vehicles can operate on conventional fuel and E-85,the BTU-adjusted price of E-85 is essential to understanding the cost implications of each fuel choice for consumers.

Highest Recorded Price:

Regular Unl.

$3.599

4/27/2008

DSL.

$4.243

4/27/2008

 

 

 

12 Month Average For Regular Unleaded

AAAFuel Gauge data may be used on a daily basis by news media Web sites, but should include attribution to AAA, the display of AAA's logo and a link to www.aaa.com. AAA's logo can be found in the "About AAA" section of the AAA NewsRoom.

3.      The Food Inflation Aspect

a.       Prior to the mandate the price for corn was holding pretty steady at slightly more than $2 per bushel.

b.      The price of corn has surged above $5 per bushel after the mandates.

c.       The mandates reduce the amount of corn available for human consumption and for feed corn-fed livestock.

d.      The increased pressure to plant more corn for ethanol has reduced the land available for wheat and soybean crops. It has also put pressure to plant corn in areas that aren’t suited to this type of agriculture and is leading to the changing of delicate ecosystems.

e.       The mandates are forcing food costs higher in areas where people are at risk for hunger and malnutrition, which brings into question the human costs associated with this mandate.

f.        The mandates have created an economic environment that impacts major aspects of not only the cost of living but of life itself.

4.      Environmental Damages

a.       Ethanol was promoted in part for its environmental benefits; lower pollution and reduced greenhouse gas emissions relative to gasoline. That is why the growing chorus of environmentalist criticism of the mandate is particularly noteworthy.

b.      There is increased skepticism about the increased inputs of energy; pesticides and fertilizer used to grow more corn.

c.       The stress on the water supplies now that corn production is being expanded in locales where rainfall is insufficient and irrigation is needed.

d.      Soon land that is protected under federal conservation programs will be cleared for more corn production.

e.       Facilities that turn corn into ethanol have environmental emission issues of their own.

f.        Ethanol production also has a negative impact on the top environmental issue of the day; Global Warming. The greenhouse gasses that were to be reduced are actually increasing. 17 to 420 times more carbon dioxide is being created than by using just gasoline.

The following links will provide more details on the facts shown above.

Time for Second Thoughts on Ethanol Mandate, 4-2-2008.pdf

Biofuels and Their Impact on Food Prices from Purdue University Extension.pdf

Corn Cuts Into Pilgrim's Pride by Ruthie Ackerman.pdf

Sierra Decoder - Corn-Fed Cars January-February 2007.pdf

Producing Ethanol Could Strain Resources from the EDF.pdf

Potential Impacts of Biofuels Expansion on Natural Resources.pdf

More postings will follow

 

About this Archive

This page is a archive of recent entries in the U.S. Legislature category.

Troops is the previous category.

United Way is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.


View my page on Rebuild the Party


U.S. Legislature: Monthly Archives

Weekly Newsletter

Sign Up Today!

* required

*







Email Marketing by VerticalResponse

My Twitter

Powered by Movable Type 4.01

Categories